Emeraude v2.60 – Doc v2.60.01 - © KAPPA 1988-2010
Guided Interpretation #4
•
B04 - 14/14
Fig B04.21 • Schematic logs
The final match shows an agreement with the overall behavior of the data. The match with
temperature is fairly close everywhere and the temperature is the one mostly driving the
solution here. The match on VAFLOW is slightly poorer and we could change the weight to
have a better match on the tubing section between the top two reservoirs. Perhaps the
capacitance calibration end points should be revised as well, as we see on the top a lack of
agreement between the DPDZ and CAP curves. Any of those changes could be made easily and
the Global Improve re-run.
As the Continuous model was used, some freedom was given to the holdups compared to the
slip model predictions. The slip velocity match track displays the slip model predictions (solid
lines) and the deviations to obtain the match, which is very small.
This concludes Guided Interpretation #4.